learning outcomes

You will get familiar with the core assumptions of Identity Negotiation Theory (INT)

You will understand INTs relation to Social Identity Theory

identity negotiation at a glance

  1. Introduction
  2. Identity Negotiation Theory (INT)
  3. INTs relation to Social Identity Theory
  4. Questions

Whether in business or in private life, human beings communicate using a complicated interaction involving exchanges of both verbal and nonverbal messages. This interaction will be examined here as to how it is used in business dealings between and among two or more communicating professionals.

1. Introduction

In a nutshell, all business communication is done to

  1. Create and preserve a unique identity
  2. Sustain that identity
  3. Safeguard that identity
  4. Clarify things
  5. To discuss and/or to negotiate possible business dealings and bases for building the trust necessary to cooperate/do business together
  6. To demonstrate that one is not a threat to others and/or is trustworthy

Communication involves a wide range of complex motivations, all related to specific communication goals. Behind these motivations lies the spectre of identity. This raises several key questions:

Who are you?

Who do you think you are?

Who do others think you are?

How does your perception of yourself – and the perception of you that others have – shape communication in business?

2. Identity Negotiation Theory (INT)

Identity is a state that may be classified and defined on the basis of many criteria and thus we have a variety of identities:

Study Task 1

Watch the talk below.
1/ How is identity presented in this part of the video lecture? (2:50-7:50)
2/ Identity seems to be perceived as central for any business company organisation. Why? (0:00-12:00)

Regardless of how we view who we are, we all go through a social conditioning process which, combined with our own individual life experiences and repeated intergroup and interpersonal interaction experiences, form who we are, how we see ourselves, how we see others and shape our personalities for all interactions to come until we die.

Study Task 2

Read the extract from the following article. Discuss the connection between identity, education, accent, social class and status in the UK. Give examples.

Accent discrimination is standard in Britain. In a poll by ComRes and ITV in 2013, 28 per cent reported experiencing it. Recruiters favour the 3 per cent of Britons who speak “the Queen’s English”, says Lance Workman, psychologist at the University of South Wales. Many British class migrants eradicate their accents, or even their original selves. North-eastern accents are especially low status…
And so Britain wastes talent. The Sutton Trust reports that just 7 per cent of Britons are privately educated, but 39 per cent of those in leading professions are. Most are men. Yet even these lucky winners rarely maximise their talent. To borrow a line from US writer John Scalzi, being a privately educated British man is like playing the computer game of life with “the lowest difficulty setting there is”. Consequently, these men can suffer from high self-esteem or get lazy.


Opinion FT Magazine
Fiona Hill, Boris Johnson and the tyranny of the plummy British accent/Two very different accents illustrate the way the UK wastes talent’, Simon Kuper, 28 NOV 2019

Negotiation in INT is how we express our identities to and with others. Basically, negotiation here is the exchange of verbal and nonverbal messages to affect the minimum 6 (business) communication types introduced above vis-à-vis others.

3. INTs relation to Social Identity Theory

Social identity Theory (SIT) treats that part of the individual’s view of the self which is derived from belonging to a relevant social group and was used to explain intergroup behaviour. SIT is used to predict certain intergroup behaviours, based on perceived group status differences, perceived legitimacy and stability of those status differences and the perceived ability to move from one group to another.

As one might guess, intergroup behaviour can raise a host of related (ethical) issues, such as prejudice, discrimination, marginalisation, mobbing, isolation and exclusion, all or any of which can cause serious problems at a business organisation and/or with one or any number of e.g. its employers/employees and/or business partners.

Study Task 3

When Nicola Thorp was sent home without pay for not wearing high heels in a London office in 2015, she started a petition against sexism and discrimination, eventually triggering a debate in British Parliament that resulted in an investigation of sexism at the workplace. The investigation revealed rampant examples of unethical behaviour in the corporate sector, with companies demanding that women ‘dye their hair blonde’, ‘wear revealing outfits’ or ‘constantly reapply makeup’. There was a call for toughening of existing law against sexism and discrimination.
How would you respond if your employer imposed a work code that you consider outmoded, discriminatory or downright offensive?

In other words, a clear sense of identity can become muddled by belonging to a group, as even a business organisation promotes a sense of belonging to a company culture which lends one a new kind of identity.

Study Task 4

Read the article below, discussing women in the tech industry, and analyse:
1/ some of the reasons for stereotypical thinking, prejudices and discrimination
2/ what accounts for gender inequality and ongoing marginalisation of women in tech industries
3/ how this discrepancy could be overcome.

Should an individual feel threatened in their identity and/or their position, or should an individual identify strongly with their company culture and seek to protect their organisation from perceived outsiders/threats, then we have the basis for conflict.

Where does conflict in business relationships come from?Examples
Personalities or value systems that are incompatibleA strong versus a weak personality
Job boundaries that overlap or are unclearly definedWhere there is a project manager and neither the customer, nor the employees in those positions clearly understand the scope of their activities
Competition over resources which are limitedMoney, a company car, a corner office
Department or group competition within a companyProcurement needs to consider lead times when placing orders for raw materials versus sales needing to promise potential customers faster delivery dates
Inadequate communicationWhen the wrong type of communication is chosen to explain a complicated problem
Organisational complexityWhen a potential customer has no idea what your company departmental abbreviations mean and always turns to the wrong department
Unreasonable or unclear policies, standards or rulesWhen you demand 30-day payment due dates in order to sign the contract, when knowing the customer can only pay in 60 days
Collective decision-makingWhenever individuals representing various, somewhat diverging interests are forced to agree to something, in order to move the business forward
Unmet expectationsA product is not delivered on time
Unresolved or suppressed conflictsWhen production engineers are fed up with being blamed for late orders

Study Task 5

Kristalina Georgieva was stepping down from her position as World Bank CEO in 2019 as she had been appointed Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, when she decided to appear in a video in a dress with Bulgarian national costume motifs to send an emotional message to her fellow Bulgarians, to the delight of some and confusion of others. Some welcomed this choice of attire, others called it inappropriate, ranging on the tasteless.
How would you describe this decision? What arguments would you offer for and against such a choice?

Social Identity Theory has its pros and its cons when studying how identity is affected by belonging to a group. One of its strengths is that SIT examines how conflict between groups is not even necessary to lead to discrimination against an outsider. Where SIT falls short is that it fails to explain why in-group favouritism may result in violent behaviour towards outsiders.


As can be read from the preceding chapter with its many examples, identity is a key factor influencing communication, as well as interpretation of how one communicates and is communicated with. One must remain mindful of all the factors that can shape identity, both as an individual and as part of a group – especially in a business setting. Many elements influence groups and individuals in how they behave towards others, whether they are aware of their behaviour or not. While identity can be thrust upon us through the place of birth or ethnicity, identity can also be a choice, just like the way one expresses identity can be a choice. In business, one must attempt to reduce conflict through pre- and proactivity, while respecting oneself and others.

Study Task 6

1/ Based on the information in Ch. 10 and your own research, compare INT and SIT, using the table below.
2/ Which model is more dynamic?
3/ Which model do you find more adequate for a business context?

Identity Negotiation TheorySocial Identity Theory
Our identity is influenced by:
• culture
• ethnicity
• gender
• one’s personal image
• religion
• social class
• sexual orientation
• family role
or status
• profession
We have two main social identities:
1/ Primary identity:
• cultural identity
• ethnic identity
• gender identity
• personal identity
2/ Situational identity, influenced by:
• role identities
• relational identity, e.g. family role or
social class
• facework identity

Questions for discussion

  1. How is one’s identity in a professional role communicated in a business context?
  2. What are the differences between NIT and SIT perspectives?
  3. What can conflict in business relationships stem from? Give some examples.
  4. Give specific examples of a/ in-group favouritism b/stereotypes in a business context.
  5. SIT suggests that an organisation can influence individuals in their behaviours, if the organisation is able to modify self-identity. Can you think of specific examples?

Questions for reflection

  1. What is the rationale for taking into account group dynamics in the Social Identity Theory model in business?
  2. How can issues such as prejudice, discrimination, marginalisation, mobbing, isolation and exclusion become serious problems in a business organisation? Think of possible ways to counteract such trends.
    Sample cases:
     Real Life Examples of Discrimination in the Workplace
     The Tiny Ways Prejudice Seeps into the Workplace
     Would You Recognize Workplace Discrimination? 9 Examples of What It Could Look Like
     Cultural Differences and Discrimination
     Examples of Prejudice
     5 Facts About Prejudice At Work
     Revealed: the stark evidence of everyday racial bias in Britain
  3. Reaching a global audience, Hollywood has been immensely influential in fighting prejudice. Philadelphia (1993) was the first major movie to help combat sexual and AIDS discrimination at work. What issues at work do you believe need to be addressed today?
For more information on the topic – check out the E-book chapter on Identity Negotiation Perspectives
Sources
  1. Armstrong, D.M. 1968. A Materialist Theory of the Mind. London, Routledge.
  2. Ashworth-Hayes, Sam. 01. January 2016. “EU immigrants aren’t taking Brits’ jobs,” InFacts Online.
  3. BBC News. 6 October 2016. “Reality Check: Do foreign workers take jobs and cut wages?” BBC News Online.
  4. Lewis, D. 1966. “An Argument for the Identity Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 63, 17-25.
  5. Place, U.T. 1988. “Thirty Years on–Is Consciousness still a Brain Process?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66, 208-219.
  6. Randerson, James. 28. March 2018. “British ‘exceptionalism’ drove Brexit, but EU media aren’t buying it,” Politico online.
  7. Tajfel, H. 1974. “Social identity and intergroup behavior,” Social Science Information. 13 (2), 65– 93.
  8. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. 1986. “The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour,” In: S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.). Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 7–24.
  9. Ting-Toomey, S. 1986. “Interpersonal ties in intergroup communication”. In: W.B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Intergroup communication. London: Edward Arnold, 114-126.
  10. Ting-Toomey, S. 2005. “Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries,” In: W.B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 211-233.

Quiz

Welcome to the interactive quiz. You can test your knowledge in this chapter by answering a few questions. Please note that the time to take the test is limited. To start press next.

Next